Important news about the Supreme Court

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Lawrence Lessig <lawrence@change-congress.org>
Date: Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:03
Subject: Important news about the Supreme Court

 

Dear Friend,

The Supreme Court is expected to rule this week on what might be the most important campaign-finance case of our time.

The case originated in the last presidential election, when a group called Citizens United tried to run TV ads promoting a film that criticized then-Senator Hillary Clinton -- without disclosing the names and identities of their donors.

After being blocked at the district level, Citizens United appealed their case all the way to the high court. But what's at issue isn't just their right to promote this film.

Simply put, an unfavorable decision -- which may come as soon as tomorrow -- could overturn generations of election law, allowing corporations to spend unlimited sums of money supporting the candidates and causes that are best not for the American people but for their bottom lines.

We don't know what the Court will decide, but we're preparing for a worst-case scenario. It's vital that we have the resources we need to fight back through grassroots lobbying, television and Internet advertising, and a nationwide movement to organize people around fundamental reform.

Make a donation to help Change Congress change this country:

http://action.change-congress.org/donate

In what may be a bit of dark humor from the Court, tomorrow -- the date many are expecting this decision will be handed down -- is also the one-year anniversary of President Obama's inauguration.

The past year has taught us a lot about how our government functions, as progressives and conservatives alike have been disappointed that a President who seemed to personify change -- whether or not you even agreed with the kind of change he was offering -- has been stymied every step of the way.

It's hard to believe that anyone could look at today's political landscape and determine that corporations need more, not less, influence over Washington. But that's exactly what the Court may do tomorrow -- and we need to be prepared to act.

This isn't just a pivotal moment, but an opportune one as well. The decision will be covered on the front pages of every newspaper in the country -- and millions of people will be wondering what they can do to bring sanity back into our political system.

We may not have another chance like this to rally people around the cause of changing our government -- and we need to make sure we have the ability to organize and motivate them all at this moment of extraordinary passion.

Please donate today to help leverage this outrage -- and build a movement for reform that even the entrenched interests in Washington cannot ignore:

http://action.change-congress.org/donate

I'll be in touch tomorrow with an update.

Best,

Lawrence Lessig

Posted via email from Ali Nabavi's posterous

Facebook: privacy and permissions

I don't really know all of the details about Facebook's most recent changes to privacy management.  I do know that they added several new features since I last attempted to configure all of my privacy and sharing settings.  One of those is being able to selectively deny content to a dynamic group.  This is possible through Facebook friend lists.

So, here's my own scenario:

I started out on Facebook by inviting my closest friends, i.e. annoying them with even more social networking spam.  YEARS LATER, most of them joined Facebook.  :-)  Once Facebook really caught on with the general Web-surfing public, all kinds of people were sending me friend requests.  I was sending friend requests to all kinds of people.  As a result, I ended up with a wide variety of relationships represented in my Facebook friends pool.

The more Facebook became a common means of communicating with people, I had to rethink what I was sharing with whom, or what I was posting on Facebook.  As a result, I narrowed the range of content that I posted.  While this might be a good idea anyway, so as not to offend and alienate every person I know (that sees my Facebook posts), I didn't like the idea of Facebook only serving as a means to share a particular grade of information with a particular grade of friend, deferring to the lowest common denominator.  "It's sunny here today.  :-)"  How enthralling!  "I like everyone.  :-)"  "I'm in no way offensive, Boss/Co-worker/Gossiping Office-Mate,  :-)"

The clearest way I could segregate people, my own litmus test, when necessary was to have a group called "f**k" -- that's the F word, kids -- or, if necessary, a group called "no f**k".  Into the former, I would put people I could use the F word with -- an indicator of familiarity and trust.  :-)  Into the latter, the people with whom I did not feel I could or should use the F word with.  Now, more descriptive, perhaps, I just created a Facebook friend list called "squares & oppressors" into with I piled an assortment of professional contacts and barely-friends.  (I'm confident that my family members have endured enough tribulations in life that some printed words are insufficient cause for them to un-friend me on Facebook.)

So, that was the biggest thing I did recently.  I went through my friends and added them to a list that I could safely remove from my circle of trust without fear that they would never get to know the real me.  Of course, once I created the list I then had to do something with it.  This is basically what I did:

• Went to http://www.facebook.com/settings/?tab=privacy.
• Clicked through each item with sharing options, i.e., displayed something like "Everyone", or "Shared with", or "Only friends", etc.
• Selected the last item in the menu, "Customize".
• In the area called "Make this visible to" I selected "Only friends" and deselected all of my networks, or selected "None of my networks".  (I didn't select "Friends of friends" because many of my coworkers I wanted to protect from my life's true nature are also friends of friends.)
• In the area called "Hide this from" I typed in the name of the friend list I made, called "squares & oppressors".
• Went to http://www.facebook.com/editapps.php?v=allowed and repeated the above steps for each link called "Edit Settings".  Some of the applications don't post or share information so they won't have fields you need to change.

Now I can go to Facebook and post the F word all day!

Now, of course, the settings I described above hide all of your shared content from the same group of people, the squares and the oppressors.  You can change those to suit your needs.  For now, I'm content with having two groups of friends on Facebook: one group that sees everything I do and another that just knows that I exist and can send messages to me and probably thinks I'm extremely boring or private.

Please let me know if you have any advice!  I'd love to make Facebook even more complicated to use responsibly.

Posted via email from Ali Nabavi's posterous

Twitter things

Sorry, was breaking my Twitter today.  Pls forgive the noise.

Pledgehammer - Make your Promises, Ple...

Quotes:

Pledgehammer - Make your Promises, Pledges and New Year's Resolutions Here

This message was sent to you by Ali Nabavi via Diigo

Web app my life | Ask MetaFilter

Quotes:

Web app my life | Ask MetaFilter

This message was sent to you by Ali Nabavi via Diigo

Online Bill Pay Reviews: Best Online Bill Pay Sites

via consumersearch.com

Looks like Paytrust.com is still the best option for automatic, on-demand bill payment. Disagree? Tell me about it! I want to know!
The thing is, Intuit now owns every financial app that I like and (sort of) use. In anticipation of their magically wrapping them all up into a super-app, I'd rather not start investing in something else.
I over-think everything.