One of my perennial occasions to POUND MY HEAD AGAINST A WALL is trying to wrestle with video issues on Linux. This time around, I was trying to once and for all figure out why Kubuntu was doing such a poor job with giving me the available 3D & window compositing effects. My mantra which was written on paper and hanging on my cube wall in front of my eyeballs for years at my old job was, "Never install proprietary video drivers! Evar!!!1" I wrote that after wasting probably a dozen hours trying to get my Ubuntu box to run as I thought it should. This time, after trying XRender (which I don't understand), then switching back to OpenGL (which I don't understand), trying different NVIDIA drivers from the Ubuntu/Kubuntu repositories (I'm using 12.04), trying to tweak my xorg.conf, etc., I finally just went to NVIDIA's site and downloaded the latest driver, dated something like last week. Of course, I installed it, rebooted it, now everything is great.
Friday, May 11, 2012
Sunday, April 8, 2012
Scripting Selenium / WebDriver with JavaScript
This is the example code I wanted to write using JavaScript:
http://code.google.com/p/selenium/wiki/GettingStarted
Here is where I looked for help when it wouldn't work[1]:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10057163/cant-run-java-example-for-selenium-webdriver
To save you the trouble: my Java is poor. :-) That's okay, because I'm not a Java programmer. I do want to script Java[2], however, using JavaScript and Mozilla Rhino. A prime candidate for learning how to do so (for me) is writing Selenium / WebDriver tests against their Java API.
I finally got the example code to work. Here is the command line:
That's my input, and the program's output. And here is the example.js file that Rhino executed:
[1] - (BTW, before this, I asked for help on irc.freenode.net on #selenium and on #java and got nearly zero response. The response was useful, though, but without any follow-up, I was left high and dry. Theoretically, IRC and other live communication channels are wonderful resources for support, but I find that the reality falls way short of that theory. Maybe it's just my theory?)
[2] - http://www.mozilla.org/rhino/ScriptingJava.html
http://code.google.com/p/selenium/wiki/GettingStarted
Here is where I looked for help when it wouldn't work[1]:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10057163/cant-run-java-example-for-selenium-webdriver
To save you the trouble: my Java is poor. :-) That's okay, because I'm not a Java programmer. I do want to script Java[2], however, using JavaScript and Mozilla Rhino. A prime candidate for learning how to do so (for me) is writing Selenium / WebDriver tests against their Java API.
I finally got the example code to work. Here is the command line:
alis-mac-pro:selenium ali$ java -cp ".:/Users/ali/Downloads/selenium-2.20.0/*:/Users/ali/Downloads/selenium-2.20.0/libs/*:/Users/ali/Downloads/rhino1_7R3/*" org.mozilla.javascript.tools.shell.Main -f example.js Page title is: Cheese! - Google Search
That's my input, and the program's output. And here is the example.js file that Rhino executed:
importClass(org.openqa.selenium.By); importClass(org.openqa.selenium.WebDriver); importClass(org.openqa.selenium.WebElement); importClass(org.openqa.selenium.htmlunit.HtmlUnitDriver); // Create a new instance of the html unit driver // Notice that the remainder of the code relies on the interface, // not the implementation. var driver = new HtmlUnitDriver(); // And now use this to visit Google driver.get("http://www.google.com"); // Find the text input element by its name var element = driver.findElement(By.name("q")); // Enter something to search for element.sendKeys("Cheese!"); // Now submit the form. WebDriver will find the form for us from the element element.submit(); // Check the title of the page print("Page title is: " + driver.getTitle());
[1] - (BTW, before this, I asked for help on irc.freenode.net on #selenium and on #java and got nearly zero response. The response was useful, though, but without any follow-up, I was left high and dry. Theoretically, IRC and other live communication channels are wonderful resources for support, but I find that the reality falls way short of that theory. Maybe it's just my theory?)
[2] - http://www.mozilla.org/rhino/ScriptingJava.html
Thursday, March 22, 2012
Tweaking display set-up on Ubuntu
(Thank you very much, Shinobu!)
I was trying to switch to the Nvidia drivers for Ubuntu 10.04, but was running into the same problem that made me ditch the drivers in the first place: I couldn't get Nvidia's config tool to rotate one of my monitors and leave the other alone.
Thanks to http://zuttobenkyou.wordpress.com/2009/10/04/linux-nvidia-xinerama-guide-rotating-just-one-monitor-in-a-dual-head-setup/ , I was able to switch to Xinerama (an Xorg extension), and rotate one of my monitors. It involved some manual editing of my /etc/X11/xorg.conf , but nothing too painful.
Here's my /etc/X11/xorg.conf :
I'm sure there's still some cruft in there, but oh well.
I was trying to switch to the Nvidia drivers for Ubuntu 10.04, but was running into the same problem that made me ditch the drivers in the first place: I couldn't get Nvidia's config tool to rotate one of my monitors and leave the other alone.
Thanks to http://zuttobenkyou.wordpress.com/2009/10/04/linux-nvidia-xinerama-guide-rotating-just-one-monitor-in-a-dual-head-setup/ , I was able to switch to Xinerama (an Xorg extension), and rotate one of my monitors. It involved some manual editing of my /etc/X11/xorg.conf , but nothing too painful.
Here's my /etc/X11/xorg.conf :
# nvidia-settings: X configuration file generated by nvidia-settings # nvidia-settings: version 1.0 (buildd@yellow) Fri Apr 9 11:51:21 UTC 2010 Section "ServerLayout" Identifier "Layout0" Screen 0 "Screen0" 1024 100 Screen 1 "Screen1" 0 0 InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard" InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer" Option "Xinerama" "1" EndSection Section "Files" EndSection Section "InputDevice" # generated from default Identifier "Mouse0" Driver "mouse" Option "Protocol" "auto" Option "Device" "/dev/psaux" Option "Emulate3Buttons" "no" Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" EndSection Section "InputDevice" # generated from default Identifier "Keyboard0" Driver "kbd" EndSection Section "Monitor" # HorizSync source: edid, VertRefresh source: edid Identifier "Monitor1" VendorName "Unknown" ModelName "DELL ST2420L" HorizSync 30.0 - 83.0 VertRefresh 56.0 - 76.0 Option "DPMS" Option "Rotate" "Left" # for portrait mode EndSection Section "Monitor" # HorizSync source: edid, VertRefresh source: edid Identifier "Monitor0" VendorName "Unknown" ModelName "DELL 1907FP" HorizSync 30.0 - 81.0 VertRefresh 56.0 - 76.0 Option "DPMS" #Option "Rotate" "Left" # for portrait mode EndSection Section "Device" Identifier "Device1" Driver "nvidia" VendorName "NVIDIA Corporation" BoardName "Quadro FX 4600" BusID "PCI:8:0:0" Screen 1 Option "RandRRotation" "on" EndSection Section "Device" Identifier "Device0" Driver "nvidia" VendorName "NVIDIA Corporation" BoardName "Quadro FX 4600" BusID "PCI:8:0:0" Screen 0 Option "RandRRotation" "on" EndSection Section "Screen" Identifier "Screen1" Device "Device1" Monitor "Monitor1" DefaultDepth 24 Option "TwinView" "0" Option "TwinViewXineramaInfoOrder" "DFP-1" Option "metamodes" "DFP-0: nvidia-auto-select +0+0" SubSection "Display" Depth 24 EndSubSection EndSection Section "Screen" Identifier "Screen0" Device "Device0" Monitor "Monitor0" DefaultDepth 24 Option "TwinView" "0" Option "metamodes" "DFP-1: nvidia-auto-select +0+0" SubSection "Display" Depth 24 EndSubSection EndSection Section "Extensions" Option "Composite" "Enable" EndSection
I'm sure there's still some cruft in there, but oh well.
Thursday, March 1, 2012
Debugging Google Chrome / Chromium CPU Horror
I hated to admit that using Google Chrome was destroying my productivity on my Ubuntu workstation at work. The CPU usage was absolutely horrible, and the average load on my machine was usually anywhere from 1.5 to 7. I know!
My workstation was fairly beefy memory-wise and CPU-wise, and had plenty of disk space. I disabled everything I could think of, enabled GPU rendering of things, disabled debugging, extensions, ETC. . . .
I exited Chrome and waited for the processes to die. Usually, I just verify this happened by looking at top; since Chrome usually owns the top spots (no pun intended), I wait until top shows no chrome processes, then I restart it. This time, I did ps for chrome and chromium processes. TURNS OUT that after using the Profile Manager[1] extension, several chrome and chromium processes were starting up every time I logged in. I verified this by looking at "~/.config/autostart", which showed several *.desktop files pointing to Google Chrome and Chromium profiles.
So far, the change is extremely significant. I recorded no benchmarks along the way, so I am unsure of how much each of my changes improved performance. However, it appears that all of the extra Chrome processes were what made the biggest difference.
Chalk up another win for blogging about anecdotal information that may or may not lead to misunderstandings about technology. :-) You're welcome!
-Ali
[1] I started using Profile Manager because I wanted to run multiple Chrome sessions in isolation, depending on what I was working on. For my day-to-day work, I use one profile. For my volunteer work, which I associate with its own Google Apps account, I use another profile. For my browser testing, I use another. THE LIST GOES ON.
My workstation was fairly beefy memory-wise and CPU-wise, and had plenty of disk space. I disabled everything I could think of, enabled GPU rendering of things, disabled debugging, extensions, ETC. . . .
I exited Chrome and waited for the processes to die. Usually, I just verify this happened by looking at top; since Chrome usually owns the top spots (no pun intended), I wait until top shows no chrome processes, then I restart it. This time, I did ps for chrome and chromium processes. TURNS OUT that after using the Profile Manager[1] extension, several chrome and chromium processes were starting up every time I logged in. I verified this by looking at "~/.config/autostart", which showed several *.desktop files pointing to Google Chrome and Chromium profiles.
So far, the change is extremely significant. I recorded no benchmarks along the way, so I am unsure of how much each of my changes improved performance. However, it appears that all of the extra Chrome processes were what made the biggest difference.
Chalk up another win for blogging about anecdotal information that may or may not lead to misunderstandings about technology. :-) You're welcome!
-Ali
[1] I started using Profile Manager because I wanted to run multiple Chrome sessions in isolation, depending on what I was working on. For my day-to-day work, I use one profile. For my volunteer work, which I associate with its own Google Apps account, I use another profile. For my browser testing, I use another. THE LIST GOES ON.
Wednesday, January 18, 2012
Fwd: Why is the Internet on strike today?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mozilla Firefox <mozilla@awesomeness.mozilla.org>
Date: Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 08:21
Subject: Why is the Internet on strike today?
From: Mozilla Firefox <mozilla@awesomeness.mozilla.org>
Date: Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 08:21
Subject: Why is the Internet on strike today?
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)